Monday, April 20, 2015

Death Takes a Weekend

http://images.huffingtonpost.com/2015-04-17-1429278588-8943305-klass_thumb_111x111-thumb.jpg By Perri Klass, M.D.
New York University, New York

I wanted my mother to write this essay. My mother was a writer all her life -- novels, memoirs, essays, even blog entries -- and in recent years she'd written some articles about aging and illness, about the indignities of becoming less independent. [1,2] So when she got sick, I decided that when she was better, I would urge her to write a piece about being in the hospital -- about pain and fear and comfort and cure, but also about unexpected revelations of hospital routine and custom, as seen from the patient's perspective. I even kept a list of topics for her, and the first one was the hospital weekend. Not too charged, I thought, not too personal -- a good way to broach the subject of being a patient and to write about a practical problem while touching on the fear and pain underneath. She would write it when she was better, when she was home, when she was cured. But there was no comfort and no cure, so here I am.



From the physician's perspective, weekends in the hospital are all about coverage. I remember, during residency, feeling that the attendings brought in doughnuts for weekend rounds because the world owed us something for being there, holding the fort. I came to take it for granted that hospital life slows on the weekend. And I remember a moment in my early years of doing primary care when it suddenly seemed vital to get an MRI and a neurology consult and a psych evaluation for a child as the clock ticked down to Memorial Day weekend. I called in favors, begged and borrowed, boasted about having managed it, as if I had personally evaluated, treated, and cured the problem, against impossible odds. I guess I assumed that patients and families must understand the hurdles: Weekends are harder and slower, things don't necessarily get done.



But when you're sick and scared, or when your parent or child is sick and scared, it can be shocking to hear, over and over, about the ways that weekends are slower and things don't get done. The sick person's calendar is marked out in difficult days and sleepless nights, or in agonizing hours, but it takes no notice of days of the week, makes no distinction between time and overtime. Yet you find yourself being told, as a matter of course, that there's no physical therapy on weekends because there's no one here to do it or, on a Friday, that the psychiatry service -- or the pain service, or the surgical subspecialty attending -- will be in on Monday.



My personal experience of seeing medicine from the patient's side is fairly limited, but in recent years I'd been helping my mother navigate her way with her multiple eye doctors, her internist, her dermatologist, her surgeon, her oncologist -- and I'd learned a great deal. For example, I learned about the daunting outpatient blood-draw system at one hospital, where she had to give her name and wait to be called to register at one desk, then wait to be called to check in at a second desk, where they'd give her one of those restaurant pagers that buzz and light up when your turn comes. Since my mother was increasingly deaf as well as legally blind, she couldn't always hear when her name was called, and she worried about missing her cue. She also hated mechanical devices and regarded the pager as likely to explode in her hands. She asked me repeatedly why a hospital made things so complicated for people who couldn't see or hear or get around easily, and I kept telling her I didn't know.



Long before that last hospitalization, I got in the habit of saying loudly -- so she would hear it as well -- to any new medical assistant or nurse or doctor who saw my mother, "You'll have to speak loudly; my mother is very sharp mentally, but her hearing isn't good. She's listening to you through hearing aids and reading your lips, but you have to speak up." My mother was shy about saying that herself but grateful to have it said, and she and I would occasionally marvel at the people who persisted in directing soft-spoken questions to me, as if what I'd said was, "I'll answer for her, she can't speak for herself, but let's just keep our voices down so we don't disturb the poor dear."



Then she got so sick that she really couldn't answer for herself. And I wasn't trying to make the medical system speak to her more clearly -- I just wanted her cared for and attended to. And my old vision of hospital weekends turned inside out. Instead of identifying with the residents who were stuck working on the weekend, heroically cross-covering way too many patients, I wanted everyone there, full-strength teams, ready for action. My mother was just as sick on Saturday as on Thursday; physical therapy or wound care or pain management was not some frivolous extra. Why should we have to hear over and over again that it was the weekend, that there was only one person here to do whatever for the whole hospital or that someone was just cross-covering, didn't want to make any changes to the plan, the attending would be in next week? It seemed callous on the hospital's part -- expecting very sick patients and very worried family members to understand that the doctors' convenience had to come first. They need the weekend off, so you'll have to wait till Monday. Even in good hospitals, weekends had a decidedly makeshift feel, with a constant refrain of, "I'm just cross-covering, we're short-staffed, the person you need will be here Monday."



My brother said to me one Saturday -- when we'd been told that there were no physical therapists available and that nutrition and the feeding team would be in on Monday -- that he had never realized how much things slowed down in a hospital on the weekend. And I didn't want to justify it or pretend that, slowed down or not, everything was fine, good medicine was being practiced, our mother was perfectly safe. Instead, I felt a powerful righteous wrath when I saw the big retrospective study last summer showing that when relatively straightforward pediatric emergency surgeries like herniorrhaphies and appendectomies were performed on weekends, morbidity and mortality were higher. [3] It's real, I thought, it's in the medical literature. There is such a thing as the "weekend effect," and it's been shown to mean higher mortality for patients with myocardial infarctions or strokes who are admitted on the weekend and also for those who have in-hospital cardiac arrests. [4,5]



I wasn't surprised by those studies. If you'd asked me before my mother got sick whether I thought patients got better care during the week, I would probably have said yes, of course they do: more people with more skills around has to mean better care, or why are we even in this business? But I would have said it, I think, without anger: That's the way of the world. Things thin out at night or on the weekend, but we all do our best, don't we?



Well, it doesn't feel that way from the patient's side. From over there, it feels like every time the weekend comes around, you relearn that the hospital is not actually about patients. It's about doctors and nurses, physical therapists and nutritionists -- people who are busily living their normal lives, when from the patient's side, nothing is normal.



It's late in life for me to realize this, but biology and life and illness have nothing to do with the conventions of the calendar. When you're sick and scared, Sunday is the same as Tuesday. I know I should have recognized that during my years of taking pediatric call on nights and weekends and deciding whether babies needed to be seen in the emergency department, but the overwhelming majority of those calls could be answered over the phone, sorting out the ibuprofen dose or encouraging more fluids for a child with gastroenteritis. It was only living daily life in the hospital, watching my mother, sick and suffering, that I made the connection. She was sick enough to be hospitalized, so by definition every day was sick day, pain day, scary day, and there was something infuriating and outrageous about being expected to accommodate the silly artificial time divisions of the people who were living out there in the sunshine world of the not-sick.



And so on weekends when my mother was in the hospital, I found myself angry and upset and outraged, and I knew, of course, that I was mostly angry, upset, and outraged because my mother was so sick and I couldn't help her -- and the truth was that the hospitals and rehab facilities couldn't help her either. They tried, especially on weekdays, but they couldn't. And if they had been able to help her, I probably wouldn't be angry, still, about weekends, or about anything else.



But I relearned hospital rhythms during those terrible weeks and months, and I developed my own version of weekend effect. I would start feeling tense every Thursday afternoon, every Friday morning, staving off panic by displaying a slightly frenetic need to get consults done, problems reassessed, orders written. I would waylay consultants, try to pin down residents about when they could come by and when they planned to sign out, press the nurses to page the attendings. I became one of those people I would have hated to encounter on a Friday afternoon if I was trying to get care plans and coverage sorted out, to feel that things were in good order, signouts organized, checklists checked off.



But over on the other side, no one had the power to check the boxes I most needed, and nothing stayed in good order for long. And over in that comfortless landscape, I felt scared, as Thursday turned to Friday and the dark clouds gathered; I could feel the staff signing out, the hospital slowing down around us, and the weekend closing in.



See the article, and read the comments, on NEJM.org.

2015-04-17-1429278588-8943305-klass_thumb_111x111.jpgListen to an audio interview with Dr. Perri Klass on experiencing weekends in the hospital from a patient's point of view.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.



from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/healthy-living/

Beyond EQ: Why Do We Fail to Take a Deep Breath in a Tough Situation?

http://images.huffingtonpost.com/2015-04-16-1429223758-7723704-lovely-thumb.jpg We look for external solutions that can help us handle difficult situations. Sometimes the best solution is all internal. This blog is an analytical tribute to "breathe, just breathe."


Just like so many things in life, we know what is the right thing to do when faced with a tough, heated situation. Maya Angelou's words "I've learned that ... people will never forget how you made them feel," ring so true. Careers and leaderships are defined by a series of events -- capsules of moments and how we react in those moments, especially the tough moments, shape the course of our history. Do we do the right thing in those moments? Before answering that, let us frame a scenario.

What happens in a stressful meeting with a coworker?


There are very few pathways to the brain -- the five senses.
2015-04-16-1429223758-7723704-lovely.jpg

Unfortunately, in those trying moments, we do not like what we see, we are pained by what we hear, where we sit is a lifeless chair which does not bring the social touch we yearn for. If we had the chance to taste and chew food that is comfortingly tasty, it has long term collateral damage on health. Unleashing the sharpest sword of self-defense, words, is a sure-fire safety valve release -- timely in the short run, self-inflicting in the long run. Possibly regret was invented as a word, after those moments.

So, what are we left with in these uncomfortable moments? Air -- the invisible medium filling the space in the tense room. It is free to take in unlimited measure. Nature's way of giving -- enhanced value for us relative to the cost for nature. It is free and readily available.

Per scientific research, deep breath is panacea to the mind. It is ours for taking. Yet we (most of us) forget. That is one of life's biggest irony. During our moment of truth, why do we not lean in to soak in the air? Here is our evolution story.

Why we fail to take a deep breath, when it matters?

"We've gone from being exposed to about 500 ads a day back in the 1970s to as many as 5,000 a day today," according to Jay Walker-Smith, Yankelovich Consumer Research. The stimulation overload can take an unconscious toll on a mind whose evolution pace is monumentally slow relative to the technological leap frogging of today. There is no distinction yet between the threat of facing a tiger in a forest and 21st century stress. As a result, we naturally breathe fast not deep in our most vulnerable moment -- moments when more adrenaline runs through our system.

In context, reality check on EQ


The words emotional intelligence invokes images of empathetic, considerate people interacting with others -- completely attuned to others feelings. That is just part of the story. There is much harder part within the science of emotional intelligence that focuses internally -- self awareness of one's own emotions. With our pace of daily life, it is already difficult to assimilate what we visually see and hear. Being consciously aware of something that is instinctive is tough. More so, when it is all internal and not physically in front of us. What is a practical solution that can trigger the self awareness when emotions are building up internally? For me, I thank the imagination of a movie director, a doyen of Tamil Cinema. Here is the backdrop.

In the mid '80s, an image captured the gyrations of the mind beautifully. It was in a south Indian Tamil movie -- a minor character found it hard to keep secrets -- the director's visual was that the actor's face expanded as time flowed. Just like the crazy mirrors in the children's museum that distorted our faces into funny faces. Except in this case, the face was constantly expanding with time, like blowing air into a crushed brown paper lunch bag. The actor's face could revert to normal shape when he could unburden himself of the secret. I am predominantly a visual learner -- that image stuck with me for the sheer clarity of expressing the internal turmoil of the mind, for my eyes to see.

Summary

We live in a world full of beautiful things. The ability to breathe, the ability to walk away and more importantly the ability to be more self aware during the moments of calling would be a nirvana, that all of us can espouse. How can we make it happen? In other words,how can we find ways to create cues for deep breathing during our moment of reckoning?

Here is my side of the story. On days when my wife senses that I have a tough meeting, as I am sharing my morning good bye and ready to walk to the car, she says, "Remember to breathe deep." Later in the day, when her words seem so apt in the meeting, the expanding "brown lunch bag" image comes to mind. I mentally overlay that image on the face in front of me. I chuckle. A chuckle that brings the deep breath to the forefront -- nobody pins me down for emotional words I chose not to say.

Let your best laid plans lead you to success and more importantly happiness in life. Breathe, just breathe.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.



from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/healthy-living/

Does Technology Impact a Child's Emotional Intelligence?

http://ifttt.com/images/no_image_card.png Travis Bradberry and Jean Greaves define Emotional Intelligence (EI) as the "ability to recognize and understand emotions in yourself and others, and your ability to use this awareness to manage your behavior and relationships." How has technology impacted EI, especially among digital natives?

Daniel Goleman, author of several books on the subject, says that the expanding hours spent alone with gadgets and digital tools could lower EI due to shrinkages in the time young people spend in face-to-face interactions. Quite rightly, as technologies divert our attention away from a realistic present, there exists the danger of disconnect that decreases EI. But can the effect be quantified, or at least qualified? Or is it hokum? EI is measured by the dimensions of self-awareness, self-regulation, motivation, empathy and social skills. How does technology impact each of these dimensions?

If self-awareness is defined as the capacity for introspection and the ability to recognize oneself as an individual separate from the environment and other individuals, the digital age does indeed have a sizable impact on self-awareness. Nora Young from CBC Spark believes that digitization and the proliferation of data is creating a new kind of self-awareness among the digital natives. The action of posting a thought on to Twitter, Facebook or some other of the myriad social networks available, could, depending on its reception by peers, cause an ego boost (bordering narcissism) or slump, more likely the latter. In a survey of 298 users of social media, 50 percent said social media made their lives and their self-esteem worse.

On one hand, many youngsters are ignorant of the privacy intrusions in their digital presence and of permanence of digital data, making them rash in posting stuff that might backfire at a later date, either on a personal level or on their employability. On the other hand, the flexibility of new digital tools undoubtedly provides students with a platform for creativity which could have a large positive impact on self awareness.

Self-regulation, the ability to stay focused and alert, is probably the one dimension of EI that is affected most by technology. Technology-induced distractions are a common complaint among parents and teachers. Ability to focus is very closely related to the emotional health of the individual, as was shown in a longitudinal study conducted with over 1,000 children in New Zealand. As Goleman aptly says, "What we need to do is be sure that the current generation of children has the attentional capacities that other generations had naturally before the distractions of digital devices. It's about using the devices smartly but having the capacity to concentrate as you need to, when you want to."

The role of technology in motivation is one area that has elicited much controversy. Many teachers bemoan the decrease in the motivation in the classroom due to the effect of fast-paced video games and instant information at their fingertips. However, there are others who believe that the digital revolution can indeed motivate students, albeit in ways hitherto unknown to the digital immigrants. Many teachers have also found noticeable increase in the level of engagement students exhibited with their projects when they were encouraged to use digital media. The appeal of digital media lies in the idea of sharing their work with a wide variety of people from all over the world through the Internet. In another example, in the Oregon Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (OAKS), which is conducted online, students enjoyed taking the exam more via the computer and answered more questions rather than guessing randomly or simply quitting, which they would have done in a paper-pencil exam.

Empathy is another area of EI that could be affected by technology. Empathy is a trait normally thought of as requiring human touch, face-to-face interactions and communication through verbal as well as non-verbal cues. E-communication tools such as chat, messaging and social networking websites, while offering the possibility of breaking free of geographic confines, pose a challenge to developing empathetic relationships with another human being. Jennifer Aaker, a professor at the Stanford Graduate School of Business and a co-author of "The Dragonfly Effect," analyzed 72 studies performed on nearly 14,000 college students between 1979 and 2009 and show a sharp decline in the empathy trait over the last 10 years.

The major culprit in the fall of empathy is the desensitization to shocking images and events that are perpetrated by all forms of media, Internet included. The gruesome videos online, not only feed grim curiosity but also remove the element of horror. Sara H. Konrath of the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor found that the self-reported empathy of college students has declined since 1980, with a steep drop in the past decade. This, understandably, coincided with the rise of students' self-reported narcissism reported by Jean M. Twenge, a psychologist at San Diego State University. Konrath believes that the increase in social isolation, has led to the drop in empathy.

The digital natives socialize in a way that is vastly different from their parents -- over 10,000 hours playing video games, over 200,000 emails and instant messages sent and received; over 10,000 hours talking on digital cell phones -- all before they leave for college. Yet, they are apparently less "connected" than their digital immigrant parents. MIT Professor Sherry Turkle states that social media, and technology are actually causing us to disconnect. A similar refrain is played by Stephen March as "we are more connected, yet we feel less connected" in, as Goleman calls it, "a kind of cauterized life." Indeed many of us are no longer "pizzled" at social gathering when our conversation partner suddenly ignores us in favour of a smart tool.

Thus it seems that technology does not bode particularly well for Emotional Intelligence. That however, does not demonize technology. As an intelligent species, we have made technology cater to our "intelligence"; as emotional beings, how difficult could it be to make it serve our emotional quotient as well?

Co-authored by Lakshmi, a Mobicip blogger who is just as passionately opinionated about the juxtaposition of technology, parenting and education.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.



from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/healthy-living/

What I Wish I Knew When I Felt Stuck in a Toxic Workplace

http://ifttt.com/images/no_image_card.png True story: I was once part of a toxic team at work.

We're talking turf wars, schemes, gossip, passive aggressiveness and dysfunctional leadership. I felt the people I was expected to work closest with were deliberately trying to prove I was incompetent. It sucked!

My relationships suffered. I was negative and complained a lot. I barely slept. I cried on Sunday mornings because Monday was near. I was constantly in fear of looking stupid. The office felt like a black hole. I was stuck.

The situation wasn't pretty.

Here's what I wish I knew then and what I'd tell anyone in a similar situation:

1. Everything Will Be Okay

I was stuck in that fight or flight response to stress. Everything felt like a threat. All I needed was to hear these words: Everything's going to be okay.

I don't deny I felt horrible, but I learned we're all resilient, courageous and strong in ways we don't know yet. I just needed to know I was going to be fine.

No matter how bad it gets, no matter how alone, afraid and overwhelmed you feel: It will get better.

2. Don't Make It Personal

Wait, it's not all about me?

The condescending remarks, deliberately renaming meetings so I was excluded, the silent glares were nothing personal. What my colleagues did and said was a reflection of their own perception of reality and had nothing to do with me.

Liberating, right?

If knew that then, I probably would've spent less time worrying about what other people thought and more time worrying about what I thought of myself.

This leads to my next point which feels paradoxical.

3. It Is Personal

What I was experiencing was deeply personal. While my co-workers' behavior was nothing to take personally, how I was reacting to it was.

The toxic nature of that place was an external reflection of how I felt inside. All the judging, blaming, condescending, criticizing and disengaging was how I treated myself. Perfectionism was strangling the life out of me.

I'm not saying take ownership of other peoples' stuff. Heck, no! Put that back. I'm saying when we find ourselves in a toxic space or relationship it has more to do with our relationship with ourselves than changing others. I had to take responsibility for my stuff before anything got better.

Change happens when we're brave enough to turn our focus inward.

Only when we're in a healthy, positive relationship with ourselves will the world reflect that back at us. Healthy relationships start with healthy limits.

4. Set Healthy Boundaries

Uh, a boundary isn't just on a map?

Yes, it was that bad.

My boss called me on weekends. I accepted assignments when I was beyond my limit. I took three weeks off to be with my mum after she was diagnosed with cancer and worked the whole time. I didn't defend myself (or others) when we were treated disrespectfully. Boundaries? I had none.

If I'd believed it was okay to say "no" at work, I wouldn't have taken on so much. If I'd stayed true to my values of respect and acceptance, I'd have taken a stand when I was treated with disdain. I probably would have taken a stand for others too.

When we communicate our limits clearly we're setting healthy expectations for our interactions with others. We're preventing burn out and resentment too. So, draw those lines.

5. Find Support

I was lucky to have some good friends at work and my fiancé at home. My only problem was asking for help.

I felt alone and like no one understood me. Mostly because I complained and blamed others without opening up about how much I was suffering. Asking for help felt like weakness. Sigh.

Now, I know reaching out is courageous.

Go to Human Resources. Get a coach or a therapist. There's no reason to feel alone and stuck. We're all in this together. Asking for help shows us we care about our own needs and think we matter.

6. Go Play in Nature

I wish someone had reminded me to prioritize play time. Maybe they did and I didn't listen...

I didn't recognize the connection between my state of mind and time spent outdoors. When I wasn't working I was numbing myself with alcohol, stress eating, complaining and gossiping. Now, time in nature is number one on my self-care repertoire.

We're natural beings. Nature is where we come from. When I get outside I feel grounded. My perspective shifts. The forest path takes me back to the basics and to what really matters. The mountain air, the salty ocean breeze... helps everything make sense.

So when you feel down and can't take another moment -- go play! Get outside. Hug a tree. Lie on the green grass and just breathe.


I know what it's like to wake up somewhere that feels awful and wonder how you got there. Now that I'm out on the other side I know that challenge was designed to teach me the most important lesson of my life.

We're filled with courage, compassion and strength. We can look inside to find the change we need. Nature will help us heal. And when we reach out to others and stop taking everything so darn personally, things get better.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.



from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/healthy-living/

In Appreciation of Those Working and Volunteering in Grief

http://ifttt.com/images/no_image_card.png With so many choices regarding how we spend our time being of service to others... why would anyone choose to work with people who are grieving? I set about posing that question to both professionals and volunteers. The results warmed my heart, and I hope you will be touched by reading these poignant accounts of what motivates such a deep level of human compassion.

Honoring His Memory
In the early 1990s, Rachel Kodonaz had a successful career in information technology and was bound and determined to break the glass ceiling of corporate America. But her priorities changed dramatically the day her husband walked out of his office, collapsed in the parking lot, and died suddenly of a heart arrhythmia. Rachel's world and her worldview changed in an instant. Returning to work as a young widow in her 20s, and mother of a 2-year-old daughter, Rachel was bewildered by her co-workers' reactions. "They didn't know how to handle me, what to do or say. My grief was the big elephant in the room."

Rachel soon made the decision to leave her job in corporate America and instead focus her efforts on breaking the glass ceiling of grief. She set herself a goal of increasing business' awareness and understanding of what employees need when they are grieving. "Companies think they are in great shape because they have a bereavement policy," bemoans Rachel. "But they need more than a few days off." In the 20 years since her husband died, Rachel has written the book Living with Loss One Day at a Time and founded The HeartLight Center in Denver, Colorado.

Rachel finds tremendous satisfaction in her work as a way of honoring her deceased husband. "I have the satisfaction that I am changing lives as I watch others grow through my experience."

A Sacred Trust
"No one just wakes up and says 'I think I want to be a grief therapist,'" observes Pat Regan, LCSW, grief therapist in Santa Monica, California who was a provider of bereavement services to a Los Angeles hospital for many years. "What I have discovered is that this field is rich in human connection. There is a resonance to it."

Regan describes what she calls "Planet Grief" as a place all its own. "People get blasted up there when the ground is pulled out from under them. Grief has a way of overwhelming our usual coping strategies. People wonder if they will ever feel better. I tell them, 'Yes, in your own way and time the pain will lessen. The waves will not hit as hard or take you down as long. One day you will begin to notice you are feeling better.'"

In the meantime, Pat reassures grievers that they are not alone as she compassionately accompanies them along their journey. "I don't tell them 'I know how you feel' because you can't really know how someone else feels. You know how you felt when this happened to you... but you don't know how they feel."

Pat sees herself continuing to do this fulfilling work because: "When someone shares their grief with you, it is a sacred trust. You hold the hope that they will heal while they are healing. It is a privilege to have this connection with another human being."

Being of Service
Each April, National Volunteer Appreciation Week is a time to recognize the contributions and accomplishments of volunteers throughout the country. Men and women who lead grief support groups shared with me what they gain from giving back, and why they choose to be of service. In their words:

"My personal belief system is based upon the premise that each individual's purpose in life is aligned with our obligation to ease the suffering of others. One of the most traumatic and inescapable events in our lives is the death of a loved one. The sense of fulfillment that comes from being a good listener as grievers express their intimate feelings and facilitating their healing process allows me to witness firsthand the easing of one's suffering. It stirs my heart and provides me with a most gratifying and soulful experience."

"I am grateful to have the opportunity to make a positive contribution toward the healing of children. If they feel better, then I feel better. Really that is how it works!"

"How could we NOT do what we do? I believe if we have made a difference in just one life, we have made a difference in the world."

"Last week I witnessed a very touching exchange between two kids in a school grief group, who four weeks ago didn't know each other. A third grade boy started to sob. He said he was so lonely since his little sister died; he had no other sisters and brothers. A fifth grade boy then got up from the other end of the table, tapped the little boy's shoulder and said, 'I'll be your big brother here at school' ... And that's why we do what we do!"

"To be in the presence of people who are in pain, and willing to share authentically in their group is an honor and a privilege. Group members get to share their lowest of lows and in doing that, start to discover hope and healing."

Hats off to these extraordinary individuals who give so generously to grieving children and adults in their darkest hour. On behalf of grievers everywhere, thank you for your dedication and compassionate hearts.

Fredda Wasserman, MA, MPH, LMFT, CT, is the Clinical Director of Adult Programs and Education at OUR HOUSE Grief Support Center, one of the nation's most respected centers for grief support and education. Fredda presents workshops and seminars on end of life and grief for therapists, clergy, educators, and medical and mental health professionals at locations throughout the country. She is the co-author of Saying Goodbye to Someone You Love: Your Emotional Journey Through End of Life and Grief. Recognized as an expert in death, dying, and bereavement, Fredda has devoted her career to life's final chapter.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.



from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/healthy-living/

The Fundamental Question About Water

http://ifttt.com/images/no_image_card.png

"What can we do without water?" In Nthalire, a remote, dusty village in Malawi, a school teacher asks the obvious question in a classroom with too many empty desks. People are remarkably resilient in less-than-ideal circumstances, but it is a resiliency focused on getting by rather than reaching one's full potential. The question points to a more fundamental question: "What can we do without health?"



Diarrhea, caused in large part by a lack of safe drinking water, sanitation and hygiene (collectively known as WASH), is the second leading killer disease in children less than five years old. When it doesn't kill, repeated bouts of diarrhea drain not just fluids but also nutrients, diminishing the ability to grow and learn and develop in a healthy way.



Still, as sobering as these facts are, more children are surviving today than ever before, and it's one of development's great success stories. Since 1990, we have cut the number of global child deaths in half, a feat which inspires the world's most famous impatient optimist, Bill Gates, to assert that we can cut that number in half again over the next 15 years.



Where we've been -- and where we could potentially go -- is thanks in large part to investment in WASH solutions. WASH continues to be one of the most practical ways we can fulfill our commitment to the world's children. If everyone had access to safe drinking water, a staggering 90 percent of diarrhea deaths could be prevented.



Research indicates that programs are most successful when they invest in holistic approaches that integrate prevention solutions, like WASH, with treatment solutions for child health. The inextricable link between WASH and child health is easily understood, but too easily forgotten in the design of funding streams and on-the-ground programs. Thankfully, trends in recent years show that the tide is turning. In 2013, UNICEF and the World Health Organization (WHO) launched the Global Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of Pneumonia and Diarrhea, setting a global standard for integrated efforts that include WASH as a key component and providing an ideal roadmap as experts convene to shape the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).



"What can we do without water?" If anything should guide the development of the SDGs, it is this practical question that arose from a school teacher, shrugging with open palms. Her simple question should remind us that treatment without prevention will never result in thriving communities; that child health outcomes do not hinge upon one "shiny" thing but rather a collection of seemingly mundane things, like a cup of clean water, a hand-washing station, a toilet; that resourcefulness in the absence of one of life's most basic needs will only take you so far.



Conversations about the best ways to answer her question by integrating WASH and child health should continue. Because diarrheal disease -- and child health more broadly -- are multifaceted issues, many voices deserve a seat at the table. At PATH's DefeatDD initiative, we aim to host a comprehensive and creative conversation, convening different advocacy communities to talk about integrated solutions. Will you add your voice?



This blog post is part of the "WASH and the MDGs: The Ripple Effect" blog series, in partnership with WASH Advocates, addressing the importance of water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) to global development. To see all the other posts in the series, click here. To learn more about WASH, visit the WASH Advocates website, and for more information about the Millennium Development Goals, click here.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.



from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/healthy-living/

Are Diet Sodas Really a Diet Food?

http://ifttt.com/images/no_image_card.png "I'll have a diet soda with my French fries and double bacon cheeseburger. Oh! And one of those apple things," he added, pointing to a pastry. The guy giving the order then looked at me as I waited my turn to order coffee at the highway restaurant rest stop. "Might as well save some calories, " he laughed as he patted his prominent abdomen. I nodded to him as I asked for my coffee to be sweetened with a packet of the blue non-calorie sweetener.

We all seem to do it: eat a high-calorie meal but drink a no-calorie beverage sweetened with something artificial, munch on a bag of potato chips along with a diet soda, dig into an obscenely rich dessert but add a non-calorie sweetener rather than sugar to our coffee or tea, and drink alcoholic beverages without concern for their calories but "freak out" if we discover we are drinking real soda, rather than the diet stuff.

But do we really think of our coffee sweetened with an artificial sweetener as diet coffee? If we add diet quinine water to a gin and tonic, is the drink now a diet drink? Is artificially-sweetened bottled cranberry juice or flavored iced tea a diet beverage? Do hard candies sweetened with a sugar substitute qualify as diet candies?

A petition just filed with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration by a California-based group, U.S. Right to Know, wants companies to stop using the word "diet" on products that use artificial sweeteners. The petition states that: "Consumers are using products -- Diet Coke and Diet Pepsi -- that are advertised to make us think they assist in weight loss, when in fact ample scientific evidence suggests that this is not true and (instead quite) the opposite may well be true." [1]

Interesting. Do people really believe that they will lose weight by drinking these products? I doubt that the man standing in front of me contemplating his snack of a double cheeseburger, fries and dessert thought that he would be three pounds lighter because he drank a diet soda. And I suspect that my not ordering a doughnut (although I wanted to) along with my coffee had more of an impact on my weight than putting that stuff from that blue packet in my coffee.

The writers of the petition reviewed the research literature on diet beverages and weight gain that seemed to confirm the need to remove the word diet from sugar-free beverages. Some studies such one published in the Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine in 2010 suggested that artificial sweeteners may contribute to weight gain, [2] and another in 2012 found that an association between artificially sweetened beverages and weight gain might exist in children. [3] But just because an association exists between two events doesn't mean there is a causative relationship between them. I have a relative who drinks copious quantities of a caffeinated diet beverage because she hates coffee and tea, but wants to consume caffeine throughout the day. She doesn't like the taste of the fructose-sweetened version of the caffeinated sodas; they taste too sweet to her. If I asked her whether she thought drinking so much diet soda would help her lose weight, her answer would be, "In my dreams."

However, might diet beverages indirectly cause weight gain? Might the man in front of me at the fast food restaurant justify ordering dessert because his beverage contained no calories? Do we have less guilt at gobbling up a rich dessert because there is no sugar in our tea? Do we reach for the sugarless chocolate ice cream in the freezer without a thought to its calories because it is artificially sweetened?

There is another, more biologically-subtle, reason why so-called sugar-free foods might cause weight gain. Many people have a natural and unavoidable craving for carbohydrates, especially in the afternoon and/or evenings. The craving arises from their brains and is related to the brain's need to make the neurotransmitter serotonin. Often the craving is accompanied by a small, but very real, deterioration in mood. Eating a carbohydrate, sweet or starchy, will restore serotonin levels and improve mood soon after the carbohydrate is digested. [4 ]If the craver attempts to satisfy this need to eat something sweet with something artificially sweetened, there will be no restoration of serotonin levels in the brain and no improvement in mood. So what happens? The craver may eventually give in to his or her craving, which was, of course, not satisfied by the diet beverage. Consequently, this person may scarf down a snack food that is sugary but also high in fat like a chocolate chip cookie, an ice cream cone, a candy bar, or a cupcake with three inches of frosting.

Perhaps if the craver satisfied the craving immediately by eating a low-calorie, mildly-sweet snack like graham crackers or licorice sticks rather than attempting to quell it with the diet beverage, the impulse to eat a fattening carbohydrate snack could have been curtailed.

It will be interesting to see what becomes of the petition. Since so many of us order a diet (fill in the blank) drink without giving a nanosecond's thought to the word diet on the label, it may be very difficult for us to get used to another name. We tend to use the work Xerox instead of copy as in, "I will Xerox this" or Kleenex rather than facial tissue as in, "I have a Kleenex." So I suspect we will continue to call artificially sweetened beverages diet, even though we know they are not.

1.) http://usrtk.org/sweeteners/diet-soda-fraud/
2.) http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2892765/
3.) http://people.musc.edu/~carsonds/B2B%20Projects/Can%20It/obesity_bev2.pdf
4.) http://www.sciencemag.org/content/174/4013/1023.short

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.



from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/healthy-living/

How Baby Teeth Can Predict Health Problems In Adulthood

http://ifttt.com/images/no_image_card.png Here's something to chew on: scientists in England may have found a new way to predict the specific health risks children will face when they grow up -- and it involves simply looking at their baby teeth.

The idea came from a new analysis of the teeth of victims of the Irish Potato Famine conducted by archaeologists at The Universities of Bradford and Durham.

Old teeth, new analysis. The researchers analyzed baby teeth unearthed from 19th-Century cemeteries in Ireland -- where victims of the famine were buried -- and in London, where many families who fled the famine settled. They looked at levels of nitrogen and carbon in the teeth, and found that the teeth of people who died in infancy had higher nitrogen levels than the teeth of people who lived into childhood or adolescence, The Guardian reported.

The finding seems to challenge the notion that high nitrogen levels are an indicator of good nourishment in infants, since nitrogen isotope levels tend to be higher in breastfed babies.

“At the period we studied, it’s likely that most babies were breastfed, but only some showed the spike in nitrogen isotope levels normally associated with it,” Dr. Julia Beaumont, professor of biological anthropology at the University of Bradford and the leader of the research, said in a written statement. “Where pregnant and breast-feeding mothers are malnourished, however, they can recycle their own tissues in order for the baby to grow and then to produce milk to feed it. We believe this produces higher nitrogen isotope levels and is what we’re seeing in the samples from the 19th-Century cemeteries.”

Predicting adult health. Beaumont added that she thinks examining the biochemical composition of the naturally shed baby teeth of living children today could help predict future health.

“If we can show that baby teeth, which are lost naturally, provide markers for stress in the first months of life, we could have an important indicator of future health risks, such as diabetes and heart disease," Beaumont said.

Beaumont is putting her idea to the test by examining the teeth of children born in Bradford between 2007 and 2010. She hopes to confirm a relationship between nitrogen and carbon isotope levels and the medical history of their mothers as well as the children's future health.

The new research was published online in the American Journal of Physical Anthropology on March 13, 2015.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.



from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/healthy-living/

Your Furry Family Members Can Be A Source Of Serious Infection For At-Risk People

http://ifttt.com/images/no_image_card.png
By Kathryn Doyle

(Reuters Health) - Pets can be a source of infection, and newborns, the elderly, children with leukemia and adults with cancer are especially vulnerable, according to a new review of data from previous research.

Selecting the right pets and using safe strategies to care for them can reduce the risk, the authors write.

"Pets have a number of really important health benefits," including emotional and social support, said lead author Dr. Jason Stull of the Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine at Ohio State University in Columbus.

And actually contracting an infection from a pet is relatively uncommon, he and his colleagues say.

"The biggest issue comes down to really recognizing when individuals are at greater risk," Stull said.

People with compromised immune systems are at increased risk for these infections and may have more severe disease, the authors write. Also at increased risk are kids under age five, adults over age 65, and pregnant women.

Pet-sourced infections have also been reported in organ donors and recipients, according to Bruno Chomel, who researches veterinary public health and zoonoses at University of California, Davis School of Veterinary Medicine. Chomel was not part of the new review.

More than half of households in the U.S. have pets, Chomel noted.

"We are not saying that you should get rid of the pet," he told Reuters Health by phone. But if your immune system is compromised, he added, "don't take in a stray pet or a kitten with fleas, and if you have young toddlers, don't take an iguana as a pet."

Many people don't realize their pets can be a source of infection, Stull told Reuters Health by phone.

Reptiles, amphibians, hedgehogs, chinchillas, rodents and young chickens are some of the "highest risk" animals, he said.

There aren't good data on actual rates of so-called zoonotic infections, because governments don't generally track diseases transmitted by companion animals, other than rabies.

But pets can theoretically transmit more than 70 human diseases via bites, scratches and contact with body fluids (such as saliva, urine, or feces, or infectious aerosols or droplets), the authors write in the medical journal CMAJ.

The new review covered more than 300 articles on infections originating in companion animals. Most of the studies were small, the authors note. The review also included guidelines developed by other experts.

Cats are the definitive host for the parasite Toxoplasma gondii, which can lead to congenital defects, encephalitis or meningitis when a pregnant woman is exposed.

"Your risk of toxoplasma is much higher from gardening or eating undercooked meat," Stull noted.


But in any case, it seems that neither doctors nor veterinarians are asking their human clients about pets or about young children, elderly people, or other vulnerable family members in the home.

"Most patients do not ever recall being asked if they have pets," Stull said.

When a child is diagnosed with cancer, the family may go out and get a new pet to help cope.

"In most situations there are options for finding a pet for that household, but it requires having a conversation with physicians and veterinarians," Stull said.

"It really requires strong integration and communication between all of these different groups," he said.

The most frequent mode of transmission is fecal-oral, Stull said, and care strategies can minimize that risk.

He and his coauthors recommend wearing protective gloves to clean aquariums and cages and remove feces, proper handwashing after pet contact, discouraging pets from face licking, covering playground boxes when not in use, avoiding contact with exotic animals, regular cleaning and disinfection of animal cages, feeding areas and bedding, locating litter boxes away from areas where eating and food preparation occur and regularly scheduling veterinary visits for all pets.

Households with immunocompromised people or very young children (under a few months of age) should avoid contact with puppies and kittens that are younger than six months, and avoid adopting a cat younger than a year old, the authors suggest. These people should also avoid young farm animals at petting zoos.

"Other practices will be important for all children under five years, such as strict hand washing and ensuring pets are healthy and receive preventive veterinary care," Stull said.

"There isn't necessarily one 'safest' animal, but mature dogs and cats who are well cared for are a lower risk," he said.

It is also important to teach children how to interact with pets to minimize the risk of bites, Stull added.

Many people today treat pets as children, and allow the pets to lick them and sleep in their beds, Chomel said.

"If pets are healthy, the risk is low, but your dog and cats walk outside and they bring things back," he said.

SOURCE: http://bit.ly/1ATHfzi CMAJ, online April 20, 2015.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.



from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/healthy-living/

Boston Marathon Runners Stand For Resilience, Patriotism, Two Years After Bombings

http://big.assets.huffingtonpost.com/FBLOGO_0.png BOSTON (AP) -- It's been decades since you could run in the Boston Marathon without qualifying, before limits on the field size made entering - almost as much as finishing - something to aspire to.

The course has changed a dozen times or more. Women were officially welcomed in 1972, wheelchairs three years later, and prize money was introduced in 1986, ushering in a professional era that rejuvenated the event and fortified its status as the world's most prestigious road race.

But nothing in more than a century has done more to shape how the Boston Marathon is perceived and how it will look in the future than the twin explosions at the finish line in 2013.

And when the field of 30,000 leaves Hopkinton on Monday for the 119th race, the effect of those bombs will be seen not just in the ever-watchful security but in the way the runners and their supporters have responded to the unprecedented attack.

"I don't think it's ever going to be just a race again," said Desiree Linden, who returns this year in search of the American victory she missed by 2 seconds in 2011. "There's so much history here: some of it is good, some of it is bad. When you run Boston, that's always going to be a part of it."

Over the more than a century since the first Boston Marathon in 1897 until Lelisa Desisa won in 2013, the event transformed from a footrace among friends into one of the world's premier athletic contests.

But not until the bombings that killed three people and wounded 260 did the marathon became a touchstone for the resiliency of a city and its signature sporting event.

Last year's race became the centerpiece of the city's recovery, and the calls to take back the finish line were answered when Meb Keflezighi became the first American man to win since 1983.

"The marathon gods blessed Meb with that run. It was electric," said Shalane Flanagan, who finished seventh last year and hopes to break a 30-year drought in the women's race. "Last year was extremely special, just being an American. It's a run I'll never, ever forget."

A daughter of marathon runners, Flanagan grew up in suburban Marblehead with a reverence for the Boston race. Just to run it was life-changing, she said; to win it would be an honor.

"Yeah, it was a race. But at the same time it was beyond a race, because of what was on the line," Keflezighi said this week as he prepared to defend his cathartic 2014 title.

"We can't get those people back; it can never be forgotten. It can never be normal, because everyone's going to think about that moment. But we do what we can," said the two-time Olympic silver medalist who had written on last year's race bib the names of those killed.

Reminders of the April 15 bombings are still easy to find two years later.

Earlier this month, a federal court jury convicted Dzhokhar Tsarnaev of all 30 counts in the bombings and the manhunt, in which an MIT police officer was killed. Jurors will soon decide whether he should be sentenced to life in prison or to death.

Mayor Marty Walsh declared a day of remembrance and community called "One Boston Day." On race day, already the state holiday of Patriots' Day, the Boston Red Sox will wear special uniforms with the city's name on their chest.

Security along the route has been increased. More miles of fencing between the runners and the fans. More officers on bicycle. Runners will again pack their belongings in see-through bags. Spectators will be screened before entering the finish-line bleachers.

"In some ways the plan is even deeper this year than it was last year," said Kurt Schwartz, the Massachusetts undersecretary for homeland security. "Last year we built something completely new. We didn't get it 100 percent right, and we figured it out along the way."

Schwartz said officials have avoided more drastic measures, like creating a buffer zone between fans and the runners, or closing off certain areas of the course to spectators entirely. "It would just so fundamentally change the character of the day. It would be short-sighted," he said.

"Last year, we still put a million or more spectators along the course. They were right along the street's edge," Schwartz said. "I don't think the experience of the spectators or runners was significantly different last year."

Everything else has changed.

Amby Burfoot, who first ran in 1965 and won the 1968 race, has watched the event grow from fewer than 500 men to an international spectacle. He has seen East Africans dominate since the race turned professional, and the addition of women, who this year will fill a record 46 percent of the field.

And he has seen the race respond to an unprecedented attack.

"Last year was without question the greatest footrace in the history of humankind," said Burfoot, who is now an editor at Runner's World magazine. "Every runner and every spectator was a hero last year. We can't do that again. There's only one of those.

"This year is almost a return to the new normalcy."

Boston Athletic Association President Joanne Flaminio said there was so much pressure last year on everyone - organizers, competitors, security - to produce an event that would help people overcome the calamity.

"I think this year it's different. We're looking forward to a new chapter in our history and the next 100 years," Flaminio said.

Consistent through that history, before the bombs and after, are themes like patriotism and resilience. Of overcoming pain and injury. Of amateurs running for charity, or just to make it to the end.

"The bombing is part of the Boston Marathon history now," four-time winner Bill Rodgers said. "But I think the public got to see what the Boston Marathon really stands for, and how the Boston area came together.

"The healing is occurring; that's what everyone wants. They want it to be a wonderful celebration, just like it has always been. And I think that's what's happening."

Like Us On Facebook
Follow Us On Twitter

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.



from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/healthy-living/

How I've Reframed My Thinking on Weight Loss and Started (Finally!) Losing Weight

http://ifttt.com/images/no_image_card.png I've tried thinking of my weight loss as a journey, but that word -- "journey" -- is so overused and tired, especially when it comes to describing weight loss. People always want to call it a journey. That word is so... namaste.

As if they're heading off on a long trip to the wilderness, where they'll "find themselves" and become enlightened to The Reason they gained weight in the first place. (Which, by the way, will not make the weight come off.)

No, not for me. Losing weight is not a journey. It's an "I've-tried-everything-under-the-sun-but-it-never-works-and-do-I-really-care-anyway-because-I-don't-look-THAT-bad" type situation.

I've tried low-carb, I've tried no-carb, I've tried green smoothies, clean eating, Weight Watchers, Body for Life, Sugar Busters, Slim-Fast, Biggest Loser, South Beach Diet, Dr. Phil's 20/20, and the Zone. I've bought quite possibly every single weight loss book on the planet.

I won't say that none of them worked. I will say that none of them worked for me, mainly because I haven't given them a chance. I'm too impatient, and I swear I've created a mental block surrounding my weight loss.

But this time it's different.

A few months ago, I had a little revelation. I thought about how odd it is that I've always been such a great employee (if I do say so myself), working my little fingers to the bone (my smallest body part) for someone else and on projects that don't benefit me at all (except for the paycheck, which, okay... that does benefit me).

I'm an advertising media planner by trade, which means I'm a trained professional planner. An experienced veteran of the advertising industry, with more than 20 years of evaluating a company's starting point and their goals for an end point, and developing a plan to take them from one to the other within a certain amount of time, using a certain amount of money.

The process is quite a puzzle, and there are always a lot of moving parts to make the plan work. Almost always, the plans require tweaks and adjustments as we check data and see areas we can optimize to keep the advertiser on track toward reaching their goals.

So, to put that in a nutshell, I'm quite capable of managing projects on an enormous scale, creating plans based on, in many cases, millions of dollars. But I haven't been able to wrangle in this much, much smaller number: 80.

I'm aware that 80 isn't a small number when it comes to weight loss. And let me be clear: Losing 80 pounds will put me just slightly above my ideal body weight, so it's not like I'm shooting for an unrealistic or unhealthy weight. (Sidebar: Who are the a-holes that create those "ideal body weight" charts?)

But I digress...

Motivated by pats on the back from my employers and clients, I pride myself on giving 100 percent in my jobs. Not to brag or anything, but I'm pretty smokin' awesome at being able to take big projects, chunking them down into manageable timelines, and getting real results.

But only when it comes to work stuff. Not when it has to do with losing weight.

I realized I had to reframe my thinking, and instead approach my weight loss as a work project. I had to stop thinking about needing to lose weight, in that way that people always say it and feel it, but never do it.

It's too personal, too close. Too easy to get bogged down by the Whatever It Is that keeps us from action.

So now I'm working on losing weight as if it were my freakin' job.

I've got my overall plan, I chunked it down into manageable tasks, and I just plug away every day on those tasks, as if they were a project that I'd be turning in for that pat on the back.

And it's working!

I'm down 22 pounds. It's hard, but really not that hard. I just started cutting back on sugar and carbs, and I've been doing cardio and minor weight lifting at least three times a week.

It's interesting, really, that after removing the emotion out of the equation, and tackling my weight loss more pragmatically -- in a more businesslike manner -- I'm finally seeing results. I'm training myself to be motivated by my own pats on the back, instead of needing them from others. It's a process.

Maybe it is a journey. Nope, I still can't do it.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.



from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/healthy-living/

Why Less-Diverse Gut Bacteria May Not Be Such A Bad Thing

http://ifttt.com/images/no_image_card.png By: Agata Blaszczak-Boxe
Published: April 16, 2015 01:57pm ET on LiveScience


Your lifestyle affects the bacteria in your poop, a new study shows: The poop of people who live in Western countries may contain a less-diverse group of bacteria than the poop of people who live of nonindustrialized countries, according to the study.



In the study, researchers compared poop samples from people in the United States with samples from people in Papua New Guinea, a nation in the South Pacific that is one of the least industrialized countries in the world. The results showed that the diversity of bacteria in the poop was greater in the samples from Papua New Guineans than in those from U.S. residents.



In fact, the U.S. poop samples lacked about 50 bacterial types that were found in the samples from the Papua New Guineans.



The finding suggests that the Western lifestyle alters the gut microbiome, which is the community of bacteria living in the gut, said study author Jens Walter, an associate professor of food and nutrition science at the University of Alberta. Differences in sanitation and the use of antibiotics between the countries could explain some of the differences in gut-bacteria diversity, he said. [Why Is My Poop Green?]



But diet also may play a role. "One hypothesis is that one of the reasons why we miss or lose some of the bacteria species in our gut is our very refined diet, which lacks fiber," Walter told Live Science.



The researchers also found that bacterial dispersal — the ability of bacteria to spread from one person to another within a community —was the dominant process that affected the microbiome in the Papua New Guineans. But this was not the case in the U.S. residents.



"Lifestyle practices that reduce bacterial dispersal —specifically, sanitation and drinking-water treatment — might be an important cause of microbiome alterations," Walter said in a statement.



The study did not examine what the gut-bacteria differences might mean for people's health, he said.



However, according to the researchers' hypothesis, changes in gut bacteria caused by a modern lifestyle may be linked to the major increase in chronic conditions such as obesity and type 2 diabetes over the past 50 years or so, Walter said. Gut bacteria play may affect people's metabolism, which plays a role in these conditions.



Such conditions are almost absent in nonindustrialized countries like Papua New Guinea, he told Live Science.



Still, overall, people in industrialized societies are healthier than people who live in Papua New Guinea, Walter said. Papua New Guineans have very high rates of infections, and their life expectancy is shorter, he added.



"The idea here is not really to criticize the modern lifestyle and its practices," he said.



"Modern lifestyle has tremendous benefits, but obviously, there is a good possibility it also came with a trade-off or collateral damage, and the idea is really to find what is it in modern lifestyle that potentially causes this collateral damage."



If researchers can figure out what it is about the modern lifestyle that causes chronic conditions, they may be better able to fight those conditions, he said.



The new study was published today (April 16) in the journal Cell Reports.



Follow Agata Blaszczak-Boxe on Twitter. Follow Live Science @livescience, Facebook & Google+. Originally published on Live Science.




Copyright 2015 LiveScience, a Purch company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
]]>

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.



from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/healthy-living/

The Real Reason I Don't Sell Weight Loss Anymore

http://ifttt.com/images/no_image_card.png Back when I took my coach training in 2009, I thought maybe I'd be a career coach, or just a general "everything" life coach. Pretty quickly, though, I realized that I was really passionate about one area, and that should be my niche: health and weight loss coaching.

You see, at that time in my life, I was deeply entrenched in the idea that I had to be thin and eat "perfectly" in order to be healthy, and that everyone else did, too.

I thought I had to eat the "right" way. I was searching for what that was, exactly, but I thought maybe I had to be vegan, or had to eat more raw foods, or had to eschew sugar, or grains, or dairy. I thought there was one perfect diet and I was going to find it and spread the word, dag nabbit!

I also thought I had to lose weight. Not just to be healthy, which was the story I always told myself and others, but also to be lovable and good enough. I was deeply, deeply attached to this idea, and I assumed others must have been, as well. If someone was overweight, I could teach them how to get thinner. How to cut back on sugar and eat the "right" way. How to get a "better" body.

I taught people this with the very best intentions, but I was coming from a pretty disordered place.

I'm no longer in the place. Now I love all of the food groups. Now I know health is about so, so much more than the number on the scale. Now I know what a bottomless self-loathing pit dieting and food obsession is. And because of that, I flat out refuse to sell weight loss anymore, to anyone.

In fact, someone in a business group I belong to told me that I should phrase my marketing materials in such a way that suggests I help women lose weight, as that would help me get more clients. That idea made my stomach hurt, and I knew there was no way on earth I would ever do that.

I don't want to help you lose weight. I want to help you feel free around food. I want to help you see how loving your body and giving up the diet mentality will make your life so much better. I want to help you see that your thoughts about what you should and shouldn't eat are creating the messed up relationship you have with food. I want to help you learn other ways to cope with your emotions besides eating.

Will you lose weight after you've learned all that? Maybe. Maybe not. I'm not making any promises when it comes to weight loss.

So the real reason I don't sell weight loss anymore? I don't want to. It just doesn't feel right to me. And I don't think any weight loss program, regardless of the promises it makes, works if you don't deal with all the other stuff first.

I truly believe you can find not only health, but happiness, by making peace with food and your body. By saying "no" to the crazy fad diets and schemes designed to help you shed 30 pounds by next Tuesday. By coming to terms with the fact that your body is not a static object that will look the same today as it did when you were in high school. By accepting you for you.

If that resonates with you, download my free guide, "The One Thing You Must Do to Stop Feeling Crazy Around Food" at www.jenpicicci.com, and say "no" to the idea that you have to lose weight in order to be healthy or whole.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.



from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/healthy-living/

Why You Should Always Inspect Your Asthma Inhaler Before Using It

http://i.huffpost.com/gen/2856688/original.jpg By: Laura Geggel
Published: April 17, 2015 06:16am ET on LiveScience.


A woman in Australia had an unexpected medical emergency on New Year's Eve after she accidentally inhaled one of her earrings, according to a new case report.



The 41-year-old woman was at a New Year's Eve party when she felt like she was starting to wheeze. She had asthma, and reached into her purse for her inhaler, according to the report published April 9 in the journal BMJ Case Reports.



The inhaler rattled when she picked it up, but the woman dismissed it as a loose connection within the device. [8 Strange Signs You're Having an Allergic Reaction]



As soon as she inhaled, the woman felt a severe scratch at the back of her throat. She coughed up blood, began wheezing and became short of breath, according to the report.


earring xrayThe woman's chest X-ray showed the earring in her right bronchus, an airway leading to the lungs.


"Unfortunately, she was not taught to replace the cap on the inhaler after she has used it," said the lead author of the case report, Dr. Lucinda Blake, a core medical trainee at St. Vincent's Hospital in Sydney. "While her inhaler was uncapped in her bag, an earring that was also loose in her bag found its way into the inhaler and became lodged in it." The heart-shaped earring was wedged within a bend inside the inhaler, making it hard to see.



What's more, the woman did not know that she should inspect the inhaler before using it, Blake said.




After an ambulance brought the woman to the hospital, she told doctors she was concerned she had swallowed a piece of foil from a medical pack in her purse. The doctors ordered a chest X-ray, and saw an abnormality right away. It had "features consistent with a stud earring," Blake said.



A CT scan confirmed the finding, showing that the earring was stuck in the woman's right bronchus, one of the two main airways leading from the trachea (windpipe) into the lungs.



Doctors treated her with antibiotics to prevent infection. They also performed a bronchoscopy: With the insertion of a thin, flexible tool with a camera into her throat, they examined her bronchus and removed the earing.



Interestingly, they found large amounts of mucus around the earring, which was "likely the body's attempt to expel the foreign body," Blake said.



earring in bronchusThis image shows the earring lodged in the woman's right bronchus.



If they had waited to remove the earring, the woman's body might have healed over the earring, embedding it within the bronchus, Blake said.



The woman made a full recovery, and is now careful to place the lid on her inhaler, Blake said. But the woman is hardly alone — more education is needed to teach patients how to store their inhalers, she said.



"I think that teaching should include explaining to patients the importance of replacing inhaler caps, teaching them how to inspect their inhalers thoroughly to ensure that there are no unwanted objects concealed and educating them on the potential damage inhaled objects can cause," Blake said.



However, some new inhalers that have attached caps may help people avoid this problem, she added.



It's rare to hear of people inhaling something as large and as hard as an earring, said Dr. Brahim Ardolic, the chairman of emergency medicine at Staten Island University Hospital, who was not involved in the patient's case.



But, it's not uncommon for people to put their capless inhalers in their pockets, and then accidentally inhale lint or thread that gets stuck in the inhaler, he said. Storing an inhaler without its cap also exposes the device to bacteria, he said.



"To be honest, if your inhaler's not covered, just don't use it," Ardolic said.



Follow Laura Geggel on Twitter @LauraGeggel. Follow Live Science @livescience, Facebook & Google+. Original article on Live Science.




Copyright 2015 LiveScience, a Purch company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
]]>

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.



from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/healthy-living/

9 Ways Women And Weed Go Together Like Mary And Jane

Making the Shift from Raising Awareness to Raising Healthy Kids

http://ifttt.com/images/no_image_card.png Our healthcare system is criticized for a greater focus on treating versus preventing disease and for not always supporting behavioral changes that lead to positive health outcomes. But many diseases, such as type II diabetes, heart disease, overweight and obesity, are complex societal issues, which many facets of society, and not just the healthcare system, play a role in preventing. Furthermore, just as the problems that have led to poor nutrition, physical inactivity, and overweight among our youth are multifaceted, so too are the solutions.

This week, schools around the country celebrate Every Kid Healthy Week, a moment during the school year to celebrate their health and wellness accomplishments achieved through nutrition and physical activity initiatives. We have come a long way since 2001 when I was Surgeon General and we issued a call to action to Prevent and Decrease Overweight and Obesity. The growing epidemic required a seismic shift in thinking about how to prevent childhood obesity, keep children from becoming overweight adults and teach lifelong habits necessary to promote health.

We identified schools as a key setting to address this national health challenge, given children spend the most time outside the home there, more than 1,200 hours per year.

Schools provide many opportunities, and share a responsibility, to help children learn healthy habits, if for no other reason than because such habits are intrinsically linked to academic success. Everyone from teachers to principals to food service professionals is positioned to teach and model healthy eating and physical activity for students. After all, schools are where children learn, and they need every advantage to do so.

Progress has been made, but schools remain a critical battle ground. Today 30 million children rely on school meals, and the nutritional quality of those meals has improved but remains an issue of debate. In many communities, the culture of unhealthy snacking has permeated schools, providing new challenges. Daily physical education, too often threatened by budget cuts, can provide a foundation for helping youth meet daily physical activity recommendations; yet daily PE is a reality in only four percent of our elementary schools.

When Action for Healthy Kids issued its first Learning Connection report in 2004, there was a growing body of research that showed associations between decreased academic performance and poor nutrition, inactivity, and overweight. The report focused on the problem, grounding society in the causes of childhood obesity and the cost to children's health and schools' bottom lines. It included nascent examples of schools working to combat the trend, but these were a drop in the bucket, as the movement for change was just beginning.

Today, the evidence linking good nutrition and physical activity with learning, cognition, behavior and academic performance is stronger than ever, detailed in an updated Learning Connection in 2013. We also have countless examples of success and best practices from schools across the country. Campbell Ridge Elementary School in Alexandria, Kentucky went from 69th to 86th percentile for state test scores following a rigorous implementation of the school's wellness policy. Toledo Public Schools in Ohio took a collaborative approach with local advocates and the teacher's union to implement a grab-and-go breakfast program, increasing school breakfast participation by 35 percent over three years. In Gulfport, Mississippi, 28th Street Elementary School transformed its school from one that offered candy rewards and once-weekly physical education classes to one that successfully introduced students to new foods in the cafeteria, holds interactive monthly healthy food tastes tests, and now ensures 60 minutes of physical activity per day.

Adding to the burgeoning research that supports the case for nutrition and physical activity in schools, obesity rate increases across several age categories remain high but appear to be slowing. The prevalence of obesity among children aged 2 to 5 years decreased significantly from 13.9 percent in 2003-2004 to 8.4 percent in 2011-2012. This improvement among our youngest children demonstrates the impact we can have when we intervene at an early age, especially among lower-income children and families. It also shows there is no silver bullet or quick fix to childhood obesity and related chronic diseases.

We have also come to realize that poor health among our youth is not an issue that can be addressed by one organization or entity alone. The gains being made across the country come not from one school or organization, but from a collective effort to impact change. Let's accelerate the movement that began more than a decade ago, no longer just to raise awareness of the threats childhood obesity poses but to shout from the rooftops about the progress being made, the many collaborative efforts, and the steps that schools, parents, communities, and the public and private sectors must continue to make in order to safeguard the health of current and future generations and indeed of our nation.

This blog post is part of a series produced by The Huffington Post and Action for Healthy Kids, in conjunction with Every Kid Healthy Week taking place in schools nationwide, April 19-25, 2015. For more information about Every Kid Healthy, email info@everykidhealthy.org.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.



from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/healthy-living/

These Campus Activists Are Pushing Back On Abortion Stigma One Sticker At A Time

http://ifttt.com/images/no_image_card.png One in 3 American women will have an abortion in her lifetime. And yet, the issue is undeniably one of the most stigmatized, politically charged ones in America. Young college activists across the country, however, are using their individual stories to make this politicized topic a personal issue.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.



from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/healthy-living/

Is Facebook Making Us Stupid, Boring and Insecure?

http://ifttt.com/images/no_image_card.png In a University of Maryland study, students were asked to go without digital tools for 24 hours. The result? Symptoms of withdrawal. Students reported: "I began going crazy." "I went into absolute panic mode." "I felt paralyzed." "I ... stared blankly. I had nothing to do." "Unplugging ... felt like turning off a life-support system." "I felt dead."

Which made me think a little more closely about my technology use, primarily Facebook, which has been a favorite in the last few years. And I started to wonder, "Is this really serving me?"

Because the truth is, I could see a little of myself in those uneasy-feeling students. Maybe it was that urge to scroll, view, like, and update I was having oh so often. Maybe it was the weird feeling that something didn't feel right, or real, or even healthy about it all. It was time for a personal check-in.

So, harmful or benign, what is it?


When I started to take an honest look at my newsfeed, I noticed that besides a few interesting articles shared, fundraisers promoted, or words of encouragement from a few "friends," the majority of what "feeds" us is grandstanding, approval seeking and ego. Been there, done that. Takes one to know one, as they say.

And the truth is, the more I stand back and just notice, myself, and others, the more I wonder, "What's real?"

Our news feeds are also scattered with an overwhelming amount of stimulation in the form of hundreds of status updates, links to follow, ads to click on and a separate streaming feed of other people's likes and comments.

And all this hyper-stimulation, all this voyeuristic viewing of others, all this posting of our personal moments in search of likes, favorites, and such, has its impacts.

Our social media is dumbing us down

I do recall a time before Facebook and mass immersion into short bites of information associated with chaotic and inattentive thinking that is rewiring the very synapses of our brains, that we actually read books, for learning and for fun.

In university we debated arguments based on research from stacks of these relics. Books with pages to turn, corners to fold, words to underline and paragraphs that we would flip back and forwards to in an attempt to find that one thought we wanted to quote for a paper.

It didn't seem unusual, then, to focus our attention on an issue long enough to see past the headline. The whole point was to try to understand the complexity of what was in front of us.

Contrast this with our newsfeed, full of short bites and quips. Post anything too long and we lose our audience's shortened attention spans.

We're boring ourselves to death

At the mercy of cookies that follow our every click and algorithms designed to serve us more of what we already like, we are destined to believe even more of what we already think we know. This is the equivalent of surrounding ourselves in a cloistered bubble of homogeneity, conformity and group think, which spells boredom.

It becomes difficult to expand our understanding, awareness and aptitudes if we are only being served up more of what we already believe and agree with.

Conversely, plunging ourselves into the unknown and deepening our learning by extending ourselves into that Vygotzkian zone of proximal development where we have an underpinning of knowledge but still have to awkwardly leap up to that next level, expands our awareness and brings novelty and challenge to our lives. This is just one delightful and expansive antidote for boring and dull.

I don't feel so great

I was running with a friend of mine, who is a top athlete, turned trainer. She said to me, "When I'm training people for marathons I teach them that the moment they notice the other person and look over their shoulder, they've lost it."

What my friend was talking about is comparison. Gone awry, it messes with our minds, our emotions, our confidence, and has us second guess even our well-developed abilities.

In a world of 7 billion people where we rub shoulders with at least a handful of other humans, there is bound to be comparison. We watch how others live, love, serve, achieve, play and more. And some of those people just give us something amazing to aspire to.

But here's the problem with Facebook and social media streams. We're comparing ourselves to the one percent of people's lives they actually want to show us. It's kind of like watching the replay of a hockey game, where only the goals are highlighted. It's not the whole picture.

Besides, that snippet of something we do see, that one percent, is it something real? Or is something photoshopped and filtered into near perfection? Real life manufactured to look like real life.

And about all those moments, those status updates, those goals in net we're jealously viewing, drooling and stewing over, remember this. We weren't beside that person the 99 percent of the time they spent getting there, screwing up and failing as humans are apt to.

Contrast that with the live person beside us in real time. We compare ourselves, imperfect as we are, to the imperfect human they are.

So why do we do all this dumbing down, boring ourselves to death, and provoking of our own insecurity? On balance, it certainly doesn't feel good, does it? And it seems like it does the opposite of improve our lives, when we could be climbing a mountain, swimming in a lake, cuddling up with a book or huddling over chai with friends.

So why are we sitting on our computers, watching other people live their lives?

For one, we're afraid of being left out. Without our continuous availability of responsive liking, commenting or sharing we may no longer belong to the group or have a presence.

We have a human need to belong and in the absence of real community, the one just outside our front doors that we shuttle past with little acknowledgement, we'll take a filler, even if it may mean tricking our brains into believing we are authentically "connected with friends."

But that's not the only reason.

Why do we keep indulging in any addiction that damages our lives?

For the same reason we gamble again, take another drink, have another cigarette, or drain the last dollars from our bank account for a pair of Gucci strappy sandals.

Because we get a hit from it.

Yes, that's good old dopamine, our pleasure chemical, and it feels juicy. The reward centers of our brain are lighting up, and like Pavlovian trained mammals we're continually throwing ourselves at the mercy of these rewards despite the gravity of the consequences.

Some of the impacts of Internet addiction include: cybersexual addiction, where users are involved in online pornography and role play chat-rooms; online affairs and relationships that replace or cause discord in personal relationships; Internet gambling and purchasing resulting in significant loss of money; and excessive web surfing and searching associated with obsessive compulsive tendencies and reduced work productivity. Addicted Internet users may feel preoccupied with the Internet, make unsuccessful attempts to control or cut back use, and become restless, moody and depressed when trying to cut back, lie about the extent of their use, jeopardize a relationship, job, or educational opportunity due to Internet use, or rely on the Internet to relieve a dysphoric mood.

As neuroscientist Frances Jensen notes, "dopamine can be triggered just as easily by the release of the latest iPhone as by alcohol, pot, sex, or a fast car. In some ways, technology is a drug."

So you be judge, and notice yourself. How you connect. How you disconnect. How much is too much? With the limited hours of life time available to each of us, are we spending them in a way that aligns with our highest aptitudes, greatest desires, and optimum health and vitality?

Because the answer to whether our social media use is harmful or benign might just lie in the question we need to ask ourselves:

"How good do I really want to feel?"

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.



from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/healthy-living/